Step 1: Group Dynamics
Identifying Patterns That Shape Student Talk
Every small group has its own rhythm—shaped by student personalities, group history, and the task at hand. Some patterns help students engage in meaningful mathematical talk, while others quietly hold it back.
In this step, you’ll observe and name common behaviors that often emerge during initial small-group work. These dynamics aren’t inherently productive—but recognizing them is the essential first step toward supporting more effective communication.
Use the Group Dynamics tool, with 10 common group dynamics organized across three different sets of challenges, to identify the dynamics at play in your small groups.
Challenges to Participation in Talk
Learned Helplessness
The group members need you, or a student that typically leads the group, to initiate work on a task. There is either no communication or off-task conversations.
Help-Leave-Silence
You initiate communication about a task between group members. The conversation terminates after you leave the group.
Own Zones
The group members are individually working on a task.
Non-Participatory Student
One or two group members are not partaking in the conversation about a task between the other group members.
Challenges to Momentum of Talk
Obstable
The group members have worked on a task and ask you for help. To respond appropriately, you need to know what work has been done.
Unsuccessful Help
Despite one group member trying to help another, the group member receiving assistance remains confused often not admitting to their remaining questions.
Dominant Student
One group member dictates the conversation often minimizing or completely overlooking the ideas of the other group members.
Challenges to Productive Talk Norms
Rush To Complete Task
The group members’ priority is to quickly complete a task with little to no assessment of their approach or solution.
Teacher As Authority
The group members perceive the teacher as the mathematical authority.
Blindly Accept Work of Others
One or more group members concur with erroneous, confusing, or incomplete reasoning.
Additional Resources